Resolution by the Academic Integrity Board<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\nThe Academic Integrity Board will hear all cases of students found responsible for prior offenses as well as all other cases that, because of their egregiousness, may result in Suspension or Expulsion from the College. Egregious cases may include, but are not limited to, ones in which graduate students allegedly plagiarized any part of their theses or capstone projects. In addition, the Vice Provost (or designee) reserves the right to send to the board for review any case at any time for any reason.<\/p>\n
The board is \u00a0comprised of five members: two matriculated students and three faculty and\/or professional staff. A quorum consists of three members of the board. The Vice Provost appoints board members upon positive recommendation from deans (in the case of faculty), divisional vice presidents (in the case of professional staff), and any faculty member, administrator, or professional staff member (in the case of students). The Vice Provost also trains each new board member for service on the board and apprises the entire board of any approved procedural changes.<\/p>\n
The Vice Provost (or designee) will provide the student with the option to meet prior to the hearing to present the evidence and to the review the policy and procedure. At the hearing, the Vice Provost (or designee) will serve as Board Advisor and, in that capacity, will present evidence, comment on procedure and admissibility of evidence, manage the hearing, and protect the rights of all parties. In addition, the Board Advisor has the right to remove from the hearing any individual who disrupts the hearing or otherwise fails to follow the procedures outlined in this policy. The Board Advisor will be present during the deliberations of the board but will not vote. The board will hear testimony from, and pose questions to, the student, the complainant, and any witnesses. The student will in turn have an opportunity to question anyone who provides information at the hearing and to respond to any evidence presented against him\/her. After the hearing, the board will determine the finding (responsible or not responsible for violating the Academic Integrity Policy) and, if responsible, the sanction. Sanctions may include Suspension or Expulsion as well as the imposition of lesser sanctions as appropriate. Graduate students found responsible for plagiarizing any part of their theses or capstone projects may be sanctioned with permanent dismissal from their programs in addition to or instead of other sanctions as appropriate. Failure to comply with sanctions by the prescribed time may result in a registration hold or other disciplinary action. The Vice Provost will communicate the finding and the sanction (if applicable) to the student and the faculty member via Ramapo e-mail.<\/p>\n
Procedural Protection<\/strong><\/h3>\nFor any hearing conducted by the Vice Provost or the Academic Integrity Board, the student shall have the following procedural protections:<\/p>\n
\n- The student will receive, in addition to the reporting form, written notice of the charges that is dated at least three (3) business days prior to any scheduled hearing with the Vice Provost (or designee) and seven (7) business days prior to any scheduled hearing with the Academic Integrity Board. A student may relinquish his or her right to the notification period by signing and executing a waiver with the Office of the Provost. All correspondence will be sent to the student\u2019s Âé¶¹´«Ã½ e-mail address. It is the responsibility of the student to access his\/her electronic mail on a daily basis.<\/li>\n
- The student will have reasonable access to the case file prior to and during the hearing, provided that all reviews of files must take place in the Office of the Provost. All case materials shall be retained in the Office of the Provost.<\/li>\n
- The burden of proof shall be upon the complainant, who must establish that the person charged is responsible for the conduct violation \u201cmore likely than not\u201d based on the credible evidence. This \u201cpreponderance of the evidence\u201d standard is a lower one than the \u201cbeyond a reasonable doubt\u201d standard employed in criminal prosecutions within the court system.<\/li>\n
- The student has the right to remain silent and not to present evidence against him\/herself.<\/li>\n
- The student has the opportunity both to question those who provide information at the proceeding and to respond to any information being presented against her\/him. Formal rules of evidence shall not be applicable pursuant to the Code of Conduct. The Hearing Officer or Board Advisor, as applicable, shall give effect to the rules of confidentiality and privilege but shall otherwise admit all information for consideration that reasonable persons would accept as having material value. Unduly repetitious or irrelevant information may be excluded.<\/li>\n
- Any member of the College community may, upon showing relevance and necessity, request witnesses to appear at a hearing conducted by the Vice Provost or the Academic Integrity Board. Character witnesses are not permissible in campus disciplinary proceedings. It is the responsibility of the complainant and the charged student to notify the Vice Provost, by fax, electronic mail, or in writing of the persons they wish called as witnesses at least three (3) business days before the proceeding. The Vice Provost will notify students who are identified as witnesses that their appearance is expected. It is generally expected that witnesses will appear in person to give testimony. Under rare circumstances, a signed, dated, and notarized statement of a witness who is unable to appear or who has been excused may be introduced at a proceeding. The decision as to whether such a document or any other alternative means of testimony may be used lies solely with the Vice Provost. Under extraordinary circumstances, the Vice Provost may require students to serve as witnesses. Students who refuse to appear as witnesses for either the complainant or the charged student may be charged with \u201cfailure to comply with the directions of College officials, including campus Public Safety officers, or officers of the law, acting in performance of their duties (Code H.17).\u201d Witnesses will be excluded from the proceeding during the testimony of other witnesses. All parties to the case and witnesses shall be excluded during any deliberations determining responsibility or sanctions.<\/li>\n
- A student charged with alleged violations, complainants, and witnesses may be accompanied by an advisor, who may be an attorney, to the hearing. An advisor may provide counsel to the student but may not speak on his\/her behalf nor appear in lieu of the student. A student who wishes to have an attorney as an advisor must inform the Vice Provost, in writing by fax, electronic mail, or by telephone at least three (3) business days before the scheduled hearing. When informed that an attorney will be present at the proceeding, the College may consult with General Counsel and\/or the New Jersey State Attorney General\u2019s Office for advice on whether legal counsel for the College should also be present.<\/li>\n
- In accordance with current guidelines established in the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), the New Jersey Open Public Records Act (OPRA) and implemented by Âé¶¹´«Ã½, the record of most disciplinary proceeding\u2019s findings is not open to the public.<\/li>\n
- In cases in which a student charged does not appear after proper notice and has no justifiable reason for non-appearance, the finding will be an \u201cuncontested admission of violation,\u201d and an appropriate sanction will be imposed.<\/li>\n
- A student will be subjected to the College\u2019s judicial process if the alleged violation occurred while s\/he was a registered student. In cases where a student charged withdraws from the College prior to the disciplinary proceeding, the judicial process will not be deferred.<\/li>\n
- Hearings will not be postponed unless under unusual circumstances set forth in the \u201cJustifiable Excuse\u201d policy for non-appearance. The policy is available in the Office of the Provost. The process is designed to be educational in nature and support the student speaking for herself\/himself; therefore, only the responding student may make a request to postpone a hearing. Requests by third parties, including counsel, will not be considered.<\/li>\n
- Where Suspension or Expulsion is a possible sanction, proceedings will be tape-recorded. Other proceedings may be recorded at the discretion of the College. These recordings are solely for the purpose of providing assistance to the Hearing Officer, the members of the Academic Integrity Board, and the appeals officer in their deliberations. These recordings remain the property of the College and constitute an official record of the proceeding.<\/li>\n
- Final decisions and a listing of any sanctions imposed will be noted by the Hearing Officer or the Board Advisor, who will be responsible for ensuring such information is conveyed in writing to the charged student and to all others as deemed necessary or appropriate. The finding will be e-mailed to the charged student no later than ten (10) business days following the date of the hearing. Notification of others with a need or right to know under the law will only take place after all possible appeal processes have upheld the finding.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
College Honors Program<\/strong><\/h3>\nIf the student is found to have violated the Academic Integrity Policy and is enrolled in the College Honors Program, the Director of the College Honors Program will be notified in order to review the student\u2019s status in the program.<\/p>\n
Final Grades<\/strong><\/h3>\nWhen a student is suspected of academic dishonesty and the case is not resolved prior to the official submission of final grades to the Registrar\u2019s Office, the Vice Provost will assign a Z grade for the course involved, using a Z grade form. Once a Z grade has been issued, the procedures described above will be followed.<\/p>\n
Repeat \/ Fail (RF) Option<\/strong><\/h3>\nIf a student receives an F in a course in which an Academic Integrity violation occurred and a sanction was imposed, the course is not eligible for RF grading.<\/p>\n